A number one heart specialist, Dr Peter McCullough, two scientists, Jessica Rose PhD and Stephanie Seneff, and veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur and an early covid vaccine trial funder, Steve Kirsch, have been among the many counter-narrative specialists who published a comprehensive scientific article within the Springer Nature journal Cureus late January that laid naked the extent to which the general public had been misled over the out there science on the protection and effectiveness of  COVID-19 vaccines. The article, which underwent a virtually 5 month intensive peer evaluation course of, paperwork main issues in the way in which that information, which led to emergency use authorizations (EUAs), subsequent registration after which international mass vaccination, have been interpreted and communicated to the general public. The writer, the Springer Nature group, is without doubt one of the largest tutorial publishers on this planet.

For these of us who’ve had considerations concerning the security of mRNA vaccines, the publication of the article cemented lots of our views over the extent to which the official narrative round COVID-19 and the silver bullet supplied to the world within the type of novel mRNA genetic vaccines had been manipulated. We had already tendered such considerations between 2020 and 2022 by means of our personal analyses of obtainable data (see our 300+ covid article repository here [in reverse chronological order]). Recognizing the censorship ongoing within the journals, and the necessity to attain past an educational viewers, we selected to publish most of our interpretation of occasions on our own website. An exception was my lead authorship of a paper on outcomes amongst unvaccinated people which was pulled from one preprint server earlier than being published in 2022 within the newly established, uncensored, peer reviewed journal, the Worldwide Journal for Vaccine Analysis, Idea and Follow.